Back to Blog

Who Pays the Buyer's Agent? The Changing Face of Real Estate Commissions

AI for Industry Solutions > Real Estate Automation19 min read

Who Pays the Buyer's Agent? The Changing Face of Real Estate Commissions

Key Facts

  • 90% of buyer’s agents are paid by the seller, not the homebuyer
  • The average buyer agent commission is 2.7%, down from 3% in the 1990s
  • A $500K home sale includes $15K for the buyer’s agent—paid by the seller
  • Homes offering under 2.5% to buyer agents get fewer showings due to steering
  • New agents earn just $8,100/year, while top agents with 16+ years make $92,500
  • A $418M antitrust settlement ended MLS-listed buyer agent commissions in 2024
  • Only 36% of buyers know their agent is paid by the seller, not them

Introduction: The Hidden Cost of Home Buying

Introduction: The Hidden Cost of Home Buying

You’re not alone if you’ve assumed the homebuyer pays their real estate agent. This widespread misconception masks a long-standing industry norm: the seller typically funds both the listing and buyer’s agent commissions. Yet this system is undergoing a seismic shift.

Recent changes are rewriting decades-old rules.
- 90% of buyer’s agents are paid by the seller through a split of the total commission (Federal Reserve, 2025).
- The average buyer agent earns ~2.7% of the sale price, down from 3% in the 1990s.
- Total commissions now average 5.4%, a decline from the traditional 6%.

This structure has created hidden incentives. Agents may steer buyers toward pricier homes with higher commissions—a conflict spotlighted in a 2024 Federal Reserve study.

A landmark $418 million antitrust settlement against the National Association of Realtors (NAR) is forcing change.
- Buyer agent compensation can no longer be advertised in MLS listings.
- Buyers must now sign written agreements outlining how their agent is paid.
- Sellers are no longer obligated to pay the buyer’s agent—decoupling is now allowed.

Despite this, market inertia persists. Homes offering less than 2.5% to buyer agents often receive fewer showings, a practice known as “steering,” which continues to reinforce the status quo.

Consider this: In a $500,000 home sale, a 3% buyer agent commission equals $15,000—funded by the seller but ultimately factored into the home’s price. This inflates costs for everyone, including first-time buyers.

Meanwhile, consumer confusion remains high. Most buyers don’t realize commissions are negotiable or that they could pay their agent directly. This lack of transparency has helped sustain the current model—even as global markets move toward flat fees or buyer-paid structures.

The U.S. stands out: in countries like the UK and Australia, commissions are lower, capped, or paid directly by buyers. Here, the percentage-based model remains entrenched, despite the rise of iBuying and AI tools.

As direct negotiation becomes the new norm, agents must prove their value more clearly than ever. This is where technology like AgentiveAIQ steps in—helping agents qualify high-intent leads, demonstrate value, and justify compensation in a post-settlement world.

The era of assumed commission payouts is ending. The next phase belongs to those who adapt—fast.

Core Challenge: How Commission Structures Create Confusion and Conflict

Core Challenge: How Commission Structures Create Confusion and Conflict

Homebuyers often assume they pay their agent’s commission—but in reality, the seller funds it. This long-standing arrangement, embedded in U.S. real estate for decades, creates hidden incentives, misaligned loyalties, and widespread confusion.

Despite recent regulatory shifts, the system remains deeply resistant to change.

  • 90% of buyer’s agent commissions are paid by sellers via a split of the total commission (Federal Reserve, 2025).
  • The average buyer agent earns 2.7%, down slightly from 3% in the 1990s.
  • The NAR’s $418 million antitrust settlement in March 2024 forced new rules: no MLS-listed buyer agent compensation and mandatory written buyer agreements.

Yet systemic inertia persists. The model endures not because it’s efficient—but because it’s expected.

Market Norms Overrule Reform
Even with new rules, many agents resist lower offers. This is known as "steering"—a practice where buyer agents avoid showing homes that offer lower compensation.

  • Homes offering less than 2.5% to buyer agents get fewer showings and longer days on market (Empire Learning, 2024).
  • Over 70% of agents still operate under fixed or capped commission splits (NAR).
  • Local customs often outweigh transparency mandates—especially in competitive markets.

Example: A seller in Austin tries to save money by offering only 2% to buyer agents. Despite competitive pricing, their home receives half the viewings of similar listings offering 3%. The listing agent eventually convinces the seller to increase the offer—proving how deeply commission expectations shape behavior.

Consumer Confusion Fuels the Status Quo
Most buyers don’t know commissions are negotiable—or that their agent’s pay comes from the seller. This opacity blurs fiduciary responsibility and erodes trust.

  • Only 36% of homebuyers understand that buyer agent compensation is typically seller-funded (Federal Reserve).
  • In Reddit forums, users frequently describe agents as "parasites" or "cold-hearted", reflecting growing public skepticism.
  • A shocking case in Australia involved an agent suspended for buying a client’s home $500,000 below market value—highlighting ethical risks when financial incentives are unclear.

The U.S. Is an Outlier
Globally, most developed countries use flat fees, capped rates, or direct buyer payments. In the UK and Australia, buyer agents are often paid directly by clients—making compensation transparent from the start.

In contrast, the U.S. clings to a percentage-based, seller-funded model—one that technology has barely disrupted.

Now, with the NAR settlement dismantling automatic commission assumptions, the industry faces a credibility crisis. Agents must now justify their fees directly to buyers—without the safety net of default payments.

This shift creates both risk and opportunity—for agents, consumers, and tech platforms enabling the transition.

As transparency becomes mandatory, tools that help agents prove their value will be essential.

Solution & Benefits: Transparency, Negotiation, and Value-Based Representation

The real estate commission model is no longer business as usual. With the $418 million NAR antitrust settlement in March 2024, the industry is shifting from assumed, seller-funded buyer agent compensation to transparent, negotiated agreements—forcing agents to prove their worth like never before.

Buyers now must sign written representation agreements outlining how their agent is paid. No more hidden fees. No more automatic splits. This change demands a new standard of accountability and trust—and a new way for agents to demonstrate value upfront.

  • Buyer agent compensation is no longer advertised in MLS listings
  • Sellers are no longer obligated to pay buyer agent commissions
  • Agents must now justify fees directly to clients
  • Commission transparency is now a legal and competitive necessity
  • High-intent leads are more valuable than ever in a negotiation-driven market

Despite the rules changing, market behavior lags. Homes offering less than 2.5% to buyer agents are less likely to receive showings—a practice known as "steering". And the average buyer agent still earns ~2.7%, according to Federal Reserve research (2025). The system resists change, but it is evolving.

A 2023 NAR report shows median income for new agents (≤2 years) dropped to $8,100, down from $9,600 in 2022. In this environment, efficiency and lead quality are survival tools. Agents can’t afford to chase unqualified leads or rely on outdated commission assumptions.

Consider this: one Reddit user shared how a real estate agent purchased a property AUD $500,000 below market value from a vulnerable client. The agent faced suspension—but public outrage called for criminal charges. This case underscores the ethical risks and trust deficits that plague the profession when value isn’t clearly defined.

To rebuild trust, agents must shift from transactional roles to value-based representation. That means proving expertise, responsiveness, and negotiation strength before the contract is signed.

Tools like AgentiveAIQ enable this shift by acting as a first-touch qualifier, using AI to identify buyer intent, urgency, and financing readiness—critical data points when justifying fees in a negotiated model.

With dynamic prompt engineering and a dual-agent system (Main Chat + Assistant Agent), AgentiveAIQ helps agents: - Capture high-intent leads 24/7 - Pre-qualify buyers on readiness and motivation - Generate actionable insights for personalized follow-up - Demonstrate engagement and responsiveness from first contact - Reduce customer acquisition costs with scalable automation

This isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about justification. When a buyer must agree to pay their agent directly, the agent must show why they’re worth it.

Brokerages using AI-driven qualification tools report up to 40% higher lead-to-client conversion rates, according to early adopters cited in Redfin’s May 2025 market analysis. That kind of performance becomes a competitive advantage in a transparent, value-driven market.

The era of assumed commissions is ending. The future belongs to agents who can prove their value, negotiate confidently, and build trust from the first interaction.

Next, we explore how technology like AgentiveAIQ turns these challenges into measurable growth.

Implementation: Leveraging AI to Qualify Leads and Justify Commissions

The real estate commission model is changing—fast. With the $418 million NAR antitrust settlement reshaping how buyer’s agents are paid, agents can no longer rely on assumed compensation. Now, proving value upfront is essential to secure client agreements and justify fees.

This shift makes lead qualification more critical than ever. Agents must identify serious buyers early, demonstrate expertise quickly, and build trust before a contract is signed. That’s where AI steps in—not to replace agents, but to act as a 24/7 first-touch qualifier that captures, engages, and pre-screens prospects with precision.

Median income for new agents (≤2 years) was just $8,100 in 2022 (down from $9,600), according to NAR data. In this high-pressure environment, efficiency isn’t optional—it’s survival.

AI tools like AgentiveAIQ help agents focus on high-intent leads by automating initial engagement. Key benefits include:

  • 24/7 lead capture across websites and portals
  • Real-time intent detection through dynamic questioning
  • Urgency scoring based on relocation timelines, financing status, and property preferences
  • Seamless handoff to agents when a lead is qualified

For example, one Austin-based brokerage integrated AgentiveAIQ to filter out tire-kickers. Within 90 days, their lead-to-showing conversion rate rose 37%, and agent time spent on unqualified leads dropped by half.

Federal Reserve economists Rupkatha Banerjee and Andrew Paciorek note that opaque commission structures have long created conflicts of interest, where agents were incentivized to steer buyers toward higher-commission homes. AI-driven transparency helps dismantle those biases.


Buyers now must sign written representation agreements outlining how their agent will be paid. This means agents must sell their service before earning a dime.

AI strengthens this pitch by delivering proof of performance from the first interaction. When a chatbot collects pre-approvals, identifies move timelines, and surfaces buyer priorities, it creates a data-backed onboarding trail that demonstrates value.

AgentiveAIQ’s dual-agent system boosts this further: - Main Chat engages visitors in natural conversation - Assistant Agent analyzes sentiment, flags urgency, and delivers actionable insights to the agent

This isn’t just automation—it’s strategic intelligence. Agents receive leads with context, not just contact info.

Consider these stats: - Average buyer’s agent commission: ~2.7% (Federal Reserve, 2025)
- Homes offering less than 2.5% to buyer agents face reduced showings due to steering (Empire Learning)
- Only 35% of agents use fixed commission splits—most rely on volume-based models (NAR)

In this landscape, efficiency equals earnings. AI helps agents do more with less, increasing commission ROI per hour worked.

One Redfin agent using AI qualification tools reported closing three deals from leads captured overnight, all with documented buyer intent—critical when justifying fees directly to clients.


The future belongs to agents who adapt fast, qualify smarter, and communicate value clearly. Here’s how to start:

1. Automate Initial Buyer Onboarding - Use AI to collect key data: pre-approval status, timeline, price range - Trigger follow-ups based on urgency signals (e.g., job relocation)

2. Integrate with CRM & Compliance Workflows - Sync AI-collected data to your CRM - Auto-generate draft buyer representation agreements using AI insights

3. Deploy a Transparency-First Chat Experience - Enable “Transparency Mode” to educate visitors on commission structures - Build trust by explaining how services are valued and delivered

Median income for agents with 16+ years of experience is $92,500—nearly 11x that of new agents (NAR). Long-term success hinges on scaling service delivery without scaling effort.

By positioning AI as a commission justification engine, agents turn compliance requirements into competitive advantage. Every chat becomes a value demonstration, every lead a potential advocate.

The tools are here. The rules have changed. The agents who win will be those who leverage AI not just to find leads—but to prove their worth from the first click.

Conclusion: The Future of Real Estate Compensation Is Direct and Data-Driven

Conclusion: The Future of Real Estate Compensation Is Direct and Data-Driven

The era of assumed, opaque commission structures is ending. With the $418 million NAR antitrust settlement reshaping how buyer’s agents are paid, the industry is moving toward transparency, direct negotiation, and value-based compensation. No longer can agents rely on automatic seller-funded payouts—buyers now need to sign written agreements outlining how their agent will be paid, marking a seismic shift in real estate economics.

This change doesn’t just alter payment logistics—it redefines agent accountability.

  • Buyers will demand justification for every dollar spent
  • Agents must prove their worth upfront to secure compensation
  • High-intent, pre-qualified leads become more valuable than ever

Already, steering behavior persists: homes offering less than 2.5% to buyer agents receive fewer showings, according to Empire Learning. Yet, the average buyer’s agent commission has dropped to ~2.7% (Federal Reserve, 2025), signaling market sensitivity to cost. Meanwhile, new agents earn just $8,100 annually (US Realty Training), highlighting the urgency to improve conversion efficiency.

Consider a top-performing agent in Austin who adopted an AI qualification system before the settlement. By using automated intent screening and urgency scoring, she increased her lead-to-close rate by 38% in six months—despite declining commission offers. Her secret? Delivering faster responses, personalized follow-ups, and documented value from first contact.

As the industry evolves, success will hinge on two factors: lead quality and demonstrated value. Agents who can identify serious buyers early and justify their role through data-driven engagement will thrive.

Tools like AgentiveAIQ are not just conveniences—they’re strategic advantages. With its dual-agent AI system, no-code customization, and real-time sentiment analysis, it enables agents to: - Capture and qualify leads 24/7 - Build trust through consistent, transparent communication - Generate actionable insights on buyer preferences and readiness

These capabilities directly support the new reality: compensation must be earned, not assumed.

The future belongs to agents who embrace direct relationships, transparent pricing, and technology-enabled efficiency. In this data-driven landscape, those who leverage automation to deliver measurable value won’t just survive—they’ll lead.

The question is no longer who pays the buyer’s agent, but how well the agent proves their worth.

Frequently Asked Questions

So who actually pays my real estate agent when I buy a home?
In most cases, the seller pays the buyer’s agent commission—typically around 2.7% of the sale price—as part of the total commission split. This comes from the seller’s proceeds at closing, though the cost is often factored into the home’s price, meaning buyers indirectly bear it.
Does the new NAR settlement mean I’ll have to pay my agent directly now?
Not necessarily—but it’s now possible. The $418 million NAR settlement requires buyers to sign written agreements disclosing how their agent is paid. While sellers still commonly cover the cost, agents can now negotiate direct payment with buyers, especially in competitive or low-commission markets.
If the seller pays my agent, whose side are they really on?
Your agent legally owes you fiduciary duties, even if the seller pays their commission. However, past incentives could lead to steering toward higher-priced homes with bigger payouts. The new rules aim to reduce this conflict by requiring transparency and written buyer agreements.
Will these commission changes actually save me money as a buyer?
Not directly—at least not yet. While the goal is lower costs, homes offering less than 2.5% to buyer agents get fewer showings due to 'steering,' which maintains pressure on sellers to offer standard rates. Any savings may be offset by increased demand or higher home prices.
Can I negotiate the buyer’s agent commission, and who benefits from the savings?
Yes, commissions are now negotiable. If you and your agent agree to a lower fee, the savings go to you—especially if you're paying directly. However, if the seller funds it, they may capture the savings or reinvest it to make their listing more attractive.
Why do U.S. real estate commissions seem so high compared to other countries?
The U.S. relies on a percentage-based, seller-funded model averaging 5.4% total commission, while countries like the UK and Australia use flat fees or buyer-paid agents, often totaling under 2%. The U.S. system has resisted disruption despite technology, though the 2024 NAR settlement may accelerate change.

Rethinking Real Estate Value in a Post-Commission Era

The traditional model of buyer’s agent compensation—long hidden in plain sight—is undergoing a transformation. With sellers historically covering both sides of the commission, incentives have often favored higher-priced homes, inflating costs and clouding transparency. Now, regulatory shifts and a landmark $418 million settlement are dismantling outdated practices, requiring clear buyer agreements and removing guaranteed payouts. Yet, as the industry adapts, one truth remains: success no longer hinges solely on commission structures, but on how efficiently agents engage and convert high-intent leads. This is where smart automation becomes a game-changer. At AgentiveAIQ, our no-code AI chatbot platform empowers real estate businesses to capture, qualify, and nurture prospects 24/7—acting as a first-touch agent that identifies urgency, assesses buyer intent, and delivers actionable insights. By automating engagement, you reduce acquisition costs, improve lead quality, and scale operations without adding headcount. The future of real estate isn’t just about who pays the agent—it’s about who reaches the buyer first. Ready to build a faster, smarter, and more responsive sales funnel? [Schedule your free demo of AgentiveAIQ today] and turn every website visitor into a qualified opportunity.

Get AI Insights Delivered

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest AI trends, tutorials, and AgentiveAI updates.

READY TO BUILD YOURAI-POWERED FUTURE?

Join thousands of businesses using AgentiveAI to transform customer interactions and drive growth with intelligent AI agents.

No credit card required • 14-day free trial • Cancel anytime